neenv

What comes next, and what is left out

Every idea neenv has considered and not yet written up is listed here, with where it stands. When one is written, it moves to its own page and leaves this list. When one is declined, it stays here with the reason.

The order of work, as the owner decided it: first patching (written; scanning application dependencies is open there), central logs (written), host firewalls (written: segmentation without them, and why a default-deny firewall on the servers at home was declined), disaster recovery with succession (written), and a second factor for privileged people (written); then the rest. The guide counts as proven when someone who wrote none of it rebuilds a working copy from it alone.

Patterns still to write

Pattern What it will explain
The first day How the first secret, the root key and the first administrator's device come to exist
Machines, network and egress Provisioning from the catalogue; the private mesh; what may reach what, inward and outward; one server or many, and the reasons to split
Certificates for private names Let's Encrypt by DNS challenge, so a private site carries a publicly trusted certificate, and the cost: the name appears in Certificate Transparency logs
Device certificates A machine proves who it is; the door refuses an administrator without one
Agent identity How each agent proves who it is, the least it may do, and how its credentials are revoked
Secrets and tokens One path per client and environment, read by the reader's own identity; rotation and expiry; break-glass access
The door A sign-in client per tenant and environment; roles given at the door
Shared services The proxy (TLS, limits, floods), databases, object store, scheduler, mail and chat, each one layer every application uses
Encryption for few readers Records only their readers can open: a household's key, customer-supplied keys in the object store
Deploys and supply chain Production changed only by audited steps; where code comes from, pinned and checked; patching
Backups and restores Each store copied off site nightly, a restore proved on a schedule, recovery targets (one tenant is written), losing a whole site
Moving a store of record An application's database moved to another engine with no replica: one recorded state (old, draining, drained, new); the drain closes writes at the one connection point and compares every row; a service boots on the new store only once drained; rollback without a restore only until the first write on the new store; the old store's binlog, not a table checksum, proves it was left untouched. Built and rehearsed twice by one application
Watching and logs Checks, alerts and the audit log; what logs keep of tenant data, and for how long; per-tenant limits
Checks, not trust An agent's work is caught where it lands: the push refuses a commit with no reason, a check refuses what does not match
What it costs The yearly total by kind: hardware, services, subscriptions

Enterprise ideas, each with a verdict

A reviewer with no knowledge of this estate read neenv and listed what an enterprise platform has that neenv does not yet cover. The verdict weighs each against an estate of one decider. Adopt means it will be written up as a pattern with a drill; consider means it is open; declined means it is not done here, for the reason given.

Area Idea Verdict
Security The development machine blocked from production by the machines, not only by credentials adopt: PostgreSQL done (Segmentation); MariaDB's account host patterns are next
Delivery Build once and promote the same artefact (a version or digest) adopt
Information Retention, deletion and a tenant's departure adopt: written, Retention and a tenant's departure
Security Per-agent sandboxes beyond the production block declined: each agent is already its own operating-system user with its own work tree and identity (The dev box)
Security Secret rotation on a schedule (OpenBao leases, dynamic database credentials) declined: the owner rotates after a leak, all at once on one day, not on a calendar; scheduled rotation broke more than it protected here. Where secrets live and who reads them is in The root of trust
Security A hardware token for the CA keys declined by the owner's ruling: no offline root and no separate custody to remember; the root key is an item in the password manager, written back only to mint an intermediate and removed again (Disaster recovery)
Operations Service objectives (SLOs) declined: one decider, no contracts that promise an availability figure; the alerts say what is broken and what to do
Delivery Rollback without losing data; expand-then-contract migrations declined from neenv: how an application changes its own schema is each application owner's practice, not the foundation's
Information Masking data copied to staging declined by the owner's ruling: developers work against current production data, the outside tenants' included. The cost is stated, not hidden: a development machine holds real tenant data. That is one reason development machines are not log senders, and why keeping them out of production's stores by the machines themselves, not only by credentials, is an adopted idea
Capacity Spares and a replacement plan for the hardware declined: the hardware is a prototype the owner replaces when funded, and may not replace like for like; what it cannot do meanwhile is listed, and any server is rebuilt from declarations onto whatever machine is next (Disaster recovery)
Security A default-deny host firewall (nftables) on the servers behind the routers declined: the routers forward three ports, and bind addresses declared per socket and checked daily do the separating without a second list of ports (why); the machines with public addresses keep theirs
Security A cluster of hardware security modules declined: a single token covers the need at this size
Reliability Full high availability for every service declined: a standby for the few single points covers it
Delivery Signed builds and a bill of materials (cosign, SLSA) declined: pinned dependencies and one promoted artefact give most of the value
Information Formal frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001) declined until a client asks for one
Capacity Cost tracking declined: the costs are few and fixed

Left out of neenv